About Me

Name:abetteridea
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

From The Front Lines

 Here's a frowarded e-mail sent via another member of the armed services. Please take note of the argumentative points as they are probably what 60 minutes should have asked the Iranian president.

I've replaced the soldiers name with YOUR FRIEND to protect him from any retribution.

All,
 
In light of recent events, I have composed a letter.  Please send it to any of your "moderate" Muslim friends.  I watch this nonsense every day, and now it seems to be poking its head into your living room again.  Just remember, for every time you hear about something like this, it has been stopped without your knowing about it at least ten or fifteen times.  It is always the same "suspect".  I, for one, am sick of it.  I will need at least a solid year without hearing the words "sectarian", "muslim", "car bomb", IED, VBIED, SVBIED, EFP, SAF, etc. Needless to say, the last ones probably get spoken in my office more than yours.  They are abreviations for the different ways they kill each other here.  Others include EJK, GSW, IDF, and many others that have no abbreviation.  While we listen to the "summaries" people yawn and fill their coffee cups.  It is endless.  Here is my letter.  Hope you all are well.
 
YOUR FRIEND
 
Dear Moderate Muslim,
 
I am writing this letter to try to glean a better understanding of Islam.  I would like to ask you a few questions to improve my understanding of Islam.  It is constantly reiterated by defenders of Islam that a "small fraction" of Muslims have highjacked Islam as their "cause", yet it does NOT coincide with the tenets of Islam.  I am told that it actually contradicts Islam. 
 
So, what exactly are these "radicals" basing their murderous campaign upon, if it is not Islam?  They constantly refer to the Holy Koran, and invoke its message when they carry out their attacks on those they consider to be infidels.  I watch news footage of other Muslim "celebrating in the streets" upon completion of these attacks.  Are these people celebrating members of a faction that falls somewhere between radical and moderate? 
 
What is the ideology that the radicals base their attacks on?  I am told that they are "radical" Muslims, but are they not in fact being schooled in the tenets of Islam?  Are they not the product of Islamic teaching?  What have you, the "moderate" Muslim, been taught that actually counters the belief that killing indiscriminately, aboard airplanes and in crowded markets and cafes is a good thing?  What special information have you recieved that apparently escapes the radicals?  Are you not using the same book?  Is there a different Koran that they read from?  Is there that much ambiguity in the Koran that hermeneutics can actually play a part in diciphering whether or not it is in keeping with the Islamic faith to board a plane and blow it up along with all of its occupants.  I have studied religion for many years now, and I wonder why it is ONLY Islam that has this "problem" with interpretation.
 
I am looking for answers from WITHIN Islam.  I want a Muslim to explain to me how two people can read the same book (the Koran) and walk away with diametrically opposed interpretations.  One of them (you, Moderate Muslim) says that you have read a book that inspires you to live a life of peace.  The other, reads the exact same book and walks away with absolute certainty that the message he has received from the SAME book is that he MUST kill all that oppose (or do not subscribe to) the message within that book.  Please explain that disparity to me, as I consider it to be important.
 
Two people hold the same book in their hands.  Two people read the exact same words on the page.  You extract a message of peace.  The other gleans from its pages a didactic mission of murderous intent coupled with absolute confidence in his assured ascendance to paradise.  Is it reasonable, for the discerning human, to conclude that you have read the same book?  Is it possible that you and I could pick up a copy of "Of Mice and Men", read it, and then come up with these two interpretations:  Me: It is a story about a man and his friend that takes care of him because he is dim-witted.  You:  It is a story about fire-breathing dragons that have come from planet Gromwelliacopse to destroy earth.
 
Is this reasonable?  Can we deduce, that perhaps, within the Holy Koran, there is, in fact, a message to be gleaned, that it is the Mission of the true Muslim to impose his faith upon the world and subject it to its laws.  If that message is not accepted by the opposition, the opposition must be killed?  Is it possible that that theme is present in the book, or must we be force-fed a silly notion that huge amounts of people have COMPLETELY misinterpreted the message contained within it?  I want a moderate Muslim to explain to me how it is possible to arrive at such an interpretation if the book has clearly delineated its PEACEFUL intent.
 
I want it further explained to me why "moderate" Muslims refuse to unite against the people who have "high jacked" their faith for their own Machiavellian designs.  Why, if it is not TRUE Islam, do the "moderates" not wage a Jihad against those who would bring the condemnation of the world upon them?  Why does this NOT happen?  Please explain, as your stifling silence befuddles me.  Why does the Muslim world not stand up and scream at the top of their collective voice, "You murderous lunatics have NOTHING to do with Islam!  We collectively condemn your actions and your false claims to the Islamic faith!  We hate you and want nothing to do with you!  You put a murderous stain on a beautiful religion!  You are the true infidels!  We condemn you and every person that agrees with, supports or sympathizes with your murderous tendencies! We will hunt you down and kill or imprison every one of you that has brought shame upon our faith!"  Why don't I ever hear that???  Why do I instead see Muslims celebrating in the streets on 9/11???
 
Is it perhaps, that while you think they might be going a little bit too far, you cannot bring yourself to condemn something verbally that you tacitly approve of?  Is this the reason?  I am asking.
 
I, for one, think that there were a substantial number of Germans who did not approve of Hitler's murderous tactics.  This silent disapproval coupled with inaction, did not protect them from the carpet-bombing that killed them in their homes when the world finally took action.  So too will be your fate if you continue to hold the official position of "they are radicals" while they continue to visit terror upon the world.  When the world reaches the point where it is not longer possible to "not mention" that the latest terrorist attack was, again, carried out by Muslims, it will be too late.  Much like it was too late for the Germans who stood by while their countrymen committed their atrocities.  When the world finally tires of this "fanaticism" that seeps from the walls of Islam, it will be ALL MUSLIMS that suffer.  All of them.  You must join the fight against them if you hope to not be the "innocent victims" of the worlds' collective hatred of your faith.  I ask you this "moderate" Muslim, when will YOU condemn the Muslims that are doing this.  All of them.  Loudly.
 
I ask you this.  Will you join the world in the fight against the people terrorizing us in the name of your faith?  I ask you this, because the world needs an answer.  We need it soon.  If your faith is NOT in keeping with the lunatics who kill everyone they can, indiscriminately, I would recommend that you denounce them post-haste.  I would recommend that you join the fight.  Pick up a weapon and join the fight.  Otherwise, you might be sitting on the same plane they blow up, in the name of YOUR faith.  Pick a side moderate Muslim.  The time has come.  Otherwise you may have to endure while the world fights all of you.  Do you want to be the innocent, silent majority that suffers the wrath of the world when it finally reaches the breaking point?  Or do you want to show us the TRUE Islam, before it is nothing more than a distant memory in the minds of those who triumphed over its murderous past? 
 
These are just a couple of questions.  I anxiously await the answers.  Until I hear from you, you will have to excuse me if I assume that you are one of the “fanatics” if you sit next to me on a plane.  Please excuse any impoliteness on my part, for until I can tell you apart by your words or deeds, I will treat you all the same: with disdain. 
 
Regards,

YOUR FRIEND
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election Issues

 

Taken from an e-mail 8/8/06


IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ARE REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT!

KEEP IT GOING!!!!
2008 Election Issue
!! Or any election for that matter!
GET A BILL STARTED TO PLACE ALL POLITICIANS ON SOC. SEC.

This must be an issue in "2008" Please! Keep it going.

SOCIAL SECURITY:
(This is worth reading. It is short and to the point.)

Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.


Our Senators and Congresswomen
do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it.

You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan.

In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.
For all practical purposes their plan works like this:
When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die.

Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments..


For example, Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275, 000.00 during the last years of their lives.

This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.
Younger Dignitaries who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives.
Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. NADA.! ZILCH...

This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them.
You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;

"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK "!

From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer). we can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month after retirement.

Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator! Bill Bradley's benefits!

Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.

That change would be to:
Jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us
then sit back.....
and see how fast they would fix it.
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve.
How many people CAN you send this to?
Better yet.....

Will you send it to your Senate and Congressional representatives?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »